Court :
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Brief :
In paragraph 2 of the judgment, it was pointed out by this Court that the learned counsel for the assessee/appellant confined his grievance only to disallowance of payment of `2,00,000/- made to one Mr. Sunil Kumar. This issue has been considered and decided in favour of the appellant/assessee holding that there was sufficient evidence to prove the expenditure of `2,00,000/- by the assessee
Citation :
RAHULJEE & COMPANY PVT. LTD. . . . APPELLANT/REVIEW PETITIONER Through: Mr. P.L. Juneja, Advocate. VERSUS INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL-I & OTHERS . . . RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel.
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CMNITY HIRE
New Delhi
Others
View Details
CAclubindia
